iff

BJ's Wholesale Club (NYSE: BJ - option chain) shares are falling today despite reporting second-quarter profit that beat estimates and announcing a share buyback. This is possibly because discretionary item spending slowed. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on BJ or similar companies like COST.

This morning, BJ opened at $38.60. So far today the stock has hit a low of $37.11 and a high of $38.98. As of 12:45, BJ is trading at $37.99, down $2.69 (-6.6%). The chart for BJ looks neutral and S&P gives BJ a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.

For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October bear-call credit spread above the $45 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 7.5% return in two months as long as BJ is below $45 at October expiration. BJ's would have to rise by more than 18% before we would start to lose money.

BJ hasn't been above $45 at all in the past year and has shown resistance around $43 recently.

Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at Investors Observer. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in BJ.

Minutes from the August Bank of England meeting may reveal a panel divided on an interest rate cut, but don't tell that to the currency market.

The pound fell about 1 cent to $1.8552 versus the dollar Wednesday -- approaching a 2-year low -- as sentiment grew regarding the need for the central bank to cut rates to avoid a recession.

In its August 7 meeting minutes (pdf), during which it kept its benchmark interest rate at 5%, some members argued for a rate cut after private banks in the United Kingdom cut GDP forecasts, while others said a rate increase was needed to check inflation expectations.

U.K. slowdown mirrors U.S. slump

London-based economist Mark Chandler told BloggingStocks Wednesday the inflation pressures stemming from oil's rise are real, but so is Britain's economic slowdown.

"Based on data I've reviewed, we're patterning America, only about a quarter late. GDP in Q2 slowed to 0.2% this year from 0.8% in Q2 last year, which is about the same deceleration rate as Q2 in America," Chandler said. "Almost certainly GDP will be negative for Q3, and I think the currency markets sense this and see a Bank of England rate cut or two up ahead."

Sometimes -- but by no means always -- the stupid questions are the most illuminating.

Tuesday's 'stupid question' concerns stress and the U.S. economy. Namely, could the U.S. economy handle more housing stress? Or, put another way, what would the U.S. economy look like with another round of major write-offs for housing-related losses?

"It's not an economic model we want to project, but project we must," economist David H. Wang said. "First, for one thing, another round of large write-offs would, as they say, end all doubt regarding a U.S. recession. We would record negative GDP for Q3 and Q4, at minimum, most likely for Q1 2009 as well."

"Second, you're looking at additional consolidation in investment banking and commercial banking," Wang said. "Third, there would be considerable U.S. Government involvement, the scope and amount of intervention by the U.S. Treasury and Fed [U.S. Federal Reserve] is difficult to specify, until the size of the problem is known."

It's hard to identify a silver lining in the above, but Wang found one, "but we don't want to go there," he said. Another series of large, housing-related write-offs "would most likely propel Congressionally-backed, federally-directed structural changes in banking, mortgage finance, securities, and financial regulation," Wang said.

"It's one thing if the nature of the bailout is another $50 or $100 billion. But if it amounts to the takeover of a large bank or Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), the American economy would see its biggest changes since the New Deal," Wang said. "These changes would most likely end, once and for all, the 'heads-the-banks-win/tails-the-government-pays' banking system. You'd most likely see a two-tier banking system."

Not the 'end of the beginning' for housing losses?

Moreover, there are signs that it's not 'the end of the beginning' regarding housing and credit market stress, at least in the view of the former chief economist for the International Monetary Fund.

Picture this: a U.S. neighborhood where no homes are being constructed, for miles.

In the current economic climate, the above could be a snapshot in any region of the country (or, sadly, in every region of the country).

U.S. housing starts fell to a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 965,000 in July, the U.S. Commerce Department announced Tuesday (pdf). It was the lowest level for housing starts in 17 years.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected July U.S. housing starts to total 950,000.

Further, housing starts have declined 29.6% in the past 12 months. Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks Tuesday he knows why.

"It doesn't take a Harvard mathematician to deduce this one. Builders are competing for sales with the large supply of foreclosed homes, as well as with home owners in good standing with banks, who are trying to sell their homes," Langan said. "So the great U.S. homebuilder pullback continues."

The U.S. economy is growing at a minuscule rate or is already in recession. Job growth, save a few sectors, is non-existent. Bank mortgage qualifying requirements are at their most rigorous levels in a decade. Investors / readers ask, 'where are the buyers going to come from to spark a rebound in the housing sector?'

The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) reports that producer prices launched upward at a 1.2% monthly rate in July. The rise in the PPI -- which was 0.7 percentage points faster than the 0.5% rate economists expected -- was the result of rising wholesale prices for energy spreading to "automobiles, prescription drugs and capital equipment."

Since the price of oil has dropped 24% from $147 to $112, should we all be relieved that July's number is a temporary blip? Let's hope so, because if not, rising wholesale prices make it even harder for businesses to make a profit when consumer demand is weak.

These higher wholesale prices mean that businesses have two options to maintain profits: keep prices the same but cut costs in other areas by finding productivity improvements, cutting back on payrolls and salaries and the likes, or raise prices to offset those rising costs.

Several independent economists have said they expect a big U.S. bank to fail. It may be easy to ignore them because they are not affiliated with any of the large institutions that monitor financial companies. But now the former chief economist of the IMF says one of America's big banks will probably not make it.

According to Reuters, "The worst of the global financial crisis is yet to come and a large U.S. bank will fail in the next few months as the world's biggest economy hits further troubles, former IMF chief economist Kenneth Rogoff said." Rogoff is currently an economist at Harvard.

The analysis pointing to the bank failure is based on the facts that the credit markets and housing situation will get much worse. Current earnings from banks and brokerage houses indicate that the prediction may well be true.

There are a few developments that gladden the heart of nearly every business executive. Rising retail sales. Rising real incomes. Sustained job growth and household formation. And lower interest rates from the Fed.

U.S. business executives, investors, and typical citizens alike may have to wait awhile for a constructive dynamic to emerge regarding the first four, but there may be some good news regarding interest rates. We're headed back down to 1.5% - - or perhaps even lower - - regarding the Federal Funds rate, so says economist David H. Wang.

Further, Wang believes an interest easing is up ahead, even though that stance would seem to fly in the face of the Dow's recent rise/signs of life, and a July U.S. consumer price statistic of 0.8%, that indicated that inflation rose at its fastest pace in 17 years.

"The July inflation number was high, but the core inflation gain of 0.3% means the U.S. Federal Reserve has some breathing room on inflation, some leeway to cut interest rates, and they're going to need it," Wang said. Wang sees the Federal Funds rate, currently at 2%, falling to 1.5% by January 2009.

Bearish on U.S. stocks, economy through early 2009

As one might sense, Wang is not bullish on the U.S. stock market or U.S. economy over the next six to nine months. Here's why: "First, the U.S. housing market has not reached a bottom. We're not even close," Wang said. "People are watching the U.S. median home price [currently about $206,500], when what they need to scrutinize is inventory levels. We're still at nine-month and ten-month inventories levels in most regions, and a healthy market has only a three-four month inventory level. So don't look for any economic stimulus from the housing sector."

What's one trend that's starting to feel the pinch of sky-high oil prices?

If you answered 40-mile commutes to work and/or tank-sized SUVs, you're right, but in this case it's the business process called the global supply chain.

The logic of, for example, shipping Brazilian iron ore to China to be made into steel, then shipping it back to Long Beach, California in the form of washing machines is making less sense today than it did when oil was $25 per barrel a decade ago, The New York Times reported.

In fact, some manufacturing that fled Mexico for even-lower-cost-labor China is now returning to Mexico because it's cheaper per unit to manufacture the goods in Mexico and send them to the United States, after oils costs for shipping are considered, The Times reported.

Spanning the world: it isn't cheap

Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks that investors / readers should expect more 'repatriation' of manufacturing if oil stays above $100 per barrel.

"Companies will be begin to shift, in some cases, on a product-by-product basis, the production of goods to net lower cost zones," Dawson said. "China's percentage of manufacturing in the world will continue to increase, but the calculus now is more complicated. It's no longer 'O.K., we need 200,000 auto motors, off we go to China.' Those motors may end up being less expensive if secured in Mexico, after transport costs are considered."

Oil prices are moving up today because of a hurricane which may hit the Gulf of Mexico. It is a signal that it does not take much to move crude prices, which have fallen from $142 to $115, in the "wrong" direction again.

According to Bloomberg, "Crude oil rose for the first time in three days as a storm near Cuba prompted evacuations from rigs and platforms in the Gulf of Mexico, which accounts for about a fifth of U.S. production. " Any disruption in production brought on by the storm would be short-lived.

The news should remind those who see crude moving toward $100 a barrel that the system of supply and demand is fragile. OPEC is talking about cutting production now that prices have fallen. The conflict between Georgia and Russia could still disrupt the flow of oil from Georgian ports. Nigeria remains an extremely unstable country. Recent reports show that China's GDP is still growing at over 10%. That growth relies heavily on gas and diesel to transport exports to shipping facilities.

The drop in oil prices may drive a certain complacency about gas and heating oil prices. It could undercut the big move is the US toward "energy independence." But that would be a sucker play. There are too many pressure points that will keep oil prices high.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Nouriel Roubini, a professor at New York University, has recently been profiled in both Barron's and The New York Times. There may be nothing special about his training or methods, but what is fairly unique is his opinion that we are on the brink of a modern version of the Great Depression.

It is hard to say why the media wants to give his analysis voice, but he has become the object of almost endless fascination.

The foundation of his view of the economy is that the current housing disaster will get much, much worse and that banks will end up writing off almost $1.5 trillion in mortgage-related paper. That is about three times what they have taken as charges so far. The New York Times quotes Roubini as saying, "A good third of the regional banks won't make it."

While a number of experts believe that the recession could last a year, Roubini would he called an extremist by most measures. He foresees a downturn lasting 18 months.

The media does not like Roubini because he may be right. They like him because predictions of great economic collapse and mayhem sell papers. That is too bad. The public deserves a more balanced view.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.

Rival home improvement chains Home Depot Inc. (NYSE: HD) and Lowe's Companies Inc. (NYSE: LOW) are scheduled to report quarterly results this week. Not surprisingly, given the ongoing housing slump, analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial on average expect both companies to post earnings lower than in the same period a year ago. For Home Depot, that's 61 cents per share, down 20.8%, and for Lowe's, 56 cents per share, down 16.4%. Meanwhile, cabinet maker American Woodmark Corp. (NASDAQ: AMWD), for whom Home Depot and Lowe's are major distributors, is also expected to report lower earnings: 11 cents per share, down 67.6%.

The presidential campaigns have prompted much discussion of energy policy and alternative energy sources. Some solar-energy-related concerns are scheduled to report this week, and expectations seem to be high. Trina Solar Ltd. (NYSE: TSL) is expected to report 81 cents per share earnings, up 67.9%; ReneSola Ltd. (NYSE: SOL) is expected to post earnings of 32 cents per share, up 62.5%; and Suntech Power Holdings Co. (NYSE: STP) is expected to have earnings of 32 cents per share, up 21.9%. Even China Sunergy Co. Ltd. (NASDAQ: CSUN) is expected to have swung to a profit of 3 cents per share, from a per-share loss of 14 cents a year ago.

Toyota Motor Corp. (NYSE: TM) says that a hybrid version of every one of its vehicles will be available by 2020.

According to The Wall Street Journal, "The announcement came as all of the auto makers at an industry conference this week in northern Michigan maneuvered to carve out their own niches in fuel-efficient design."

But, 12 years from now, hybrids may be useless.

Nuclear energy may drive 100% of the U.S. needs for electric power.

The massive oil reserves found off Brazil and in the Arctic may have driven up oil supplies so that gas is back to $1.25.

Wind power may have undercut the need for oil-heat in many American homes.

Solar power will probably have replaced other fuels for furnishing most homes and small businesses with energy.

The hybrid car may not be such a great idea.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

One way investors/readers could characterize the current environment is as a world filled with concerns.

Concern about the U.S. housing sector. Concern about declining U.S. disposable income. Concerning about slowing GDP growth in Europe and Asia. Concern about the Yankees not winning the American League pennant.

O.K., that last item was a purely subjective, parochial one, but you get the point: there's concern that global economic conditions are worsening, not improving.

Europe's GDP is latest focal point

Further, while emerging markets in Asia, led by China and India, have been the growth story of the decade, the region really sending a chill up economists' -- business executives' -- spines is Europe, so says economist Glen Langan.

"Up through July we had seen weakness in Italy, Greece, Spain, and Portugal, and the investment community's response was one of 'no big deal, they are not the major growth regions, anyway,'" Langan said. "But now there's signs of slowing in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, and nearly every demand-side indicator is in retreat. It's a pronounced psychological shift, no question."

T. Boone Pickens does not care if the price of oil is falling. His opinion is that most of the drop is over and that his plan for wind energy is still viable and necessary for future U.S. independence from crude imports.

Pickens could not be described as faint-hearted. Rumors are that his $7 billion BP Capital hedge fund took a 35% haircut in July by betting the wrong way on oil and gas. It is a paper loss, but must sting nonetheless.

Some argue that Pickens is old and monumentally rich so gambles on wind and oil don't mean much for his own fortune. That could indicate that his conviction about wind-powered energy is not based on greed. Since he has spent his life aggressively accumulating wealth, that is not likely.

What is likely is that he thinks oil prices may stay very high and that his alternative energy will do remarkably well because it is infinitely renewable. If so, it is too bad his hedge fund cannot invest a few billions into wind technology. He can't afford another 35% loss. At some point his convictions may put him in the poor house. At least as it would be viewed by a billionaire.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com

It is a perverse bit of news: Americans are spending more on gas than on cars. Bloomberg writes that "Gasoline accounted for about 4.4 percent of spending in June, compared with 3.9 percent for autos and motor parts, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis."

This is a tragedy for the auto industry as much as it is the sign of a self-inflicted wound. It also says the car business is not likely to recover soon.

The domestic car industry may produce only about 14.5 million unit sales this year. That may mean that almost no individual company will have a profit. By some estimates, vehicles sales could drop to 13 million next year. If oil stays around $120, gas will probably not drop much below $3.50.

What the news says about the consumer is frightening and goes well beyond car sales. If a typical household cannot afford a new car and gas for a year, then many households are probably on the edge when it comes to mortgage and food costs, especially as home loans continue to reset to higher levels. As the economy loses jobs, more people will not be able to cover either car payments or gas.

The statistics on cars are more than a forecast for the industry. They are a harbinger for the broader economic health of the country.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.